Me: Frank Lynch. Bio These are my daily rants, mostly political. For something less spontaneous, I maintain The Samuel Johnson Sound Bite Page (over 1,800 Johnson quotes), perhaps your best online resource for insight into his thinking.
Make mine a camel burger. Camels were introduced to Australia's outback in the 19th century, and seemed like a natural fit for transportation in a world that had yet to fully appreciate the concept of unintended consequences (yeah, as if we do yet). Well, it's certainly a natural fit for the feral camels, whose population grows by about 80,000 a year, doubling every nine. (The rule of thumb of 72 makes that about 8% growth.)
devastating fragile desert ecosystems, scar[c]e water supplies, rare plants and animals, Aboriginal cultural resources, remote communities and pastoral stations.
"Because camels are cautious creatures and beautifully camouflaged, and because these areas are sparsely settled, most people are simply unaware of the sheer numbers of these introduced pests, or the extent of the damage they're causing," said Glenn Edwards, of the NT Department and Natural Resources and Environment.
Four years ago there was discussion of exporting camel meat, but that wasn't mentioned in the more recent news article. Still, I like buffalo, ostrich... never had horse or that Louisiana rodent whose name I can never remember (another invasive imported species), but I'd certainly give it a try. All in the name of helping Australia, of course.
(HT to Boing Boing.) (Lastly, just in case, the headline here is drawn from an old cigarette advertising slogan, so perhaps I should remind you that the Surgeon General has concluded that cigarette smoking is hazardous to your health.)
UPDATE: The Louisana rodent is the Nutria, as Joel reminds in the comments. The State of Louisiana has a small web site devoted to the pest.
Bloomberg's deep pockets. He spent $102 million of his own money getting reelected this past November. And still only won by 5% over a candidate who drew little support from Obama or other Democrats.
Somebody needs a better barometer for voter anger — this election could have gone to the Democrat.
The "true Republican" test gets weirder. Responding to questions as to whether or not Reagan would have passed his test for true Republicans, James Bopp weaves and dodges. Applying his 2010 yardstick to Reagan is silly, just because "everyone knows" "Ronald Reagan was the most conservative President in the last 100 years." So there.
Here's the wild part: if they were to have had a similar test in 1980, the questions would have been different, appropriate for the issues of the day. And the list for 2012 might be different from the list for 2010, or 2014... It's going to be based on the context of the day.
Which means it has little or nothing to do with principles, which do not change. Calvinball, however, does.
Defending the filibuster. Timothy Noah (Slate) and Byron York (Washington Examiner) discuss the value of filibusters in a bloggingheads video:
Sadly, while Noah mentions the huge difference in the frequency of filibusters now vs. in the 1960's, York completely bypasses that issue, instead quoting Fred Thompson's observation that filibusters, once bad, are now "good." I can see Thompson's point, and I can see why it appeals to York, but there are a lot of things which are fundamentally "good" but lose their "goodness" when used immoderately. Green beans are also good, but see how much you like them if you eat them 21 meals a week, 52 weeks a year.
The Republicans are in a position now where they have so little to offer the country that the filibuster is about all they can do, and so they do it; over, and over, and over. They have become the whiny, crying kid at the next table in the restaurant who won't shut up, won't get with the program, and whose parents won't hasten their meals.
If the Republicans played the filibuster as rarely as the Democrats did under Bush, maybe their filibuster over healthcare would be seen as a serious point. Problematically, it makes them look as if they are simply obstructionist. (Except when it comes to special allowances for all states whose names begin with the letter "U.")
The Republican Party is better off without RINO's like Reagan. A conservative member of the RNC is proposing a "purity" test for candidates; they have to adhere to eight of ten principles in order to get party funding.
Over at the Nation, John Nichols scores Reagan on them, and Reagan flunks. For all ten, there's something in Reagan's record which would have riled the wing nuts. Reagan. RINO. Has a ring to it, doesn't it?
Obama to escalate in Afghanistan. Despite the best efforts of Bill Moyers to draw parallels between what he sees in Afghanistan and what he saw in Vietnam during his tenure in the LBJ White House, despite all sorts of questions as to whether or not Afghanistan can be propped up, Obama is heading towards sending in more troops, saying it's his "intention to finish the job".
So I pulled out this map, and there's this paved road to hell...
In fairness, I will wait to hear his strategy, but I will bring my skepticism to the party, as the party deserves it. Never show up empty handed, I always heard.
In the meantime, if OBL is hidden in some dark cave, maybe there's a nice dark cave for the thoughts of Dick Cheney?
On Monday, former Vice President Dick Cheney said that Obama has put troops in danger by dragging out the decision on whether to send more troops, first through more than 20 hours of meetings leading up to a ninth and final session on Monday night, and then by putting off announcing the decision until after Thanksgiving.
"The delay is not cost-free," Cheney told a conservative radio talk show host. "Every day that goes by raises doubts in the minds of our friends in the region what you're going to do, raises doubts in the minds of the troops."
Hey, Dick, very curious that you never cared that much about it when we pulled troops out of Afghanistan to go fight a country that never attacked us, and gave AQ a brand new recruiting tool in the process. Heckuva job, Dick.
b-b-b-but Obama returned the bust of Churchill! Ah, yes, our special relationship with Great Britain, and how Obama tore it all to shreds. Great Britain is starting an investigation into its involvement into the Iraq War, which happened under Obama and Blair, of course. I suggest you read about how much the British troops thought Americans were cognizant of the special relationship. You may have to scroll down to find it, but it would be better to read the thing.
The joys of local news. An anchor on Chicago's Fox affiliate used a pie chart instead of a bar chart, and the pie summed to 193%... It's all logical of course, when Republican voters don't have to choose.
This error is so fundamental, I doubt that Tufte even covers it.
